Category: Keith Hyatt - Leads to Results/Infasource

Sunday, April 10, 2005

4/8/05—my DRE complaint about Infasource and Hyatt, CBSK, Bob Molnar, Archer Finance, Prime One

You can expect a junk faxer like Hyatt to lie and to commit perjury. 

The conduct of the DRE brokers sure is perplexing.  Is the DRE just another agency working to protect its members, the brokers?  Is that why Laura Archer (broker Archer Finance) and Todd Dalton (broker Prime One Financial) decided to simply ignore my suit?

CBSK, dba American Home Loans, apparently condones the illegal marketing.  My correspondence with their attorney Russell Grandy is posted at Fight Back!!!

Grandy is a liar, another scum sucking bottom feeding attorney.  I will never talk to him on the phone again unless I have his permission to record. 

We shall see what happens.  The long promised press release is next.  Wish I could triple the hours in my day.

MORE...

Saturday, April 09, 2005

My 4/8/05 request for FCC Citation of Hyatt and Infasource, Inc.

I still can’t believe that Hyatt had the nerve to lie about my “registration.”

Below is my complaint to the FCC.

MORE...

Wednesday, April 06, 2005

Keith Hyatt and Infasource filings and my response

I posted the 3/14/05 Infasource & Hyatt filings and my response

It’s hilarious that they continue to claim that I “registered” for the junk faxes.

I sure hope that LOTS of people sue Hyatt and the brokers he sells to.  While some brokers really don’t know that the leads come from illegal marketing such as junk faxes and spam, they *are* responsible for the marketing.

At the very least they ought to provide all information and documentation about the lead generatior instead of covering up for morons like Hyatt.

And of course they can and should sue Hyatt.

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

Michael Hornak, Rutan & Tucker - re. Keith Hyatt, Infasource and Leads To Results junk faxing

I hope my e-mail is selfexplanatory.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Michael T. Hornak
Rutan & Tucker

1/24/05

Dear Mr. Hornak:

I am very glad you wrote!  Although I’m perplexed because your letter states that you also faxed it and I didn’t receive the fax. 

All I can find in the logs is a hangup call from 714-641-5100 on 1/12/2005 at 3:31:09 PM - which seems to be your telephone #.  Am I not getting the “real” faxes?

I sure don’t have a problem receiving the junk! 

Please let me know whether you really faxed your letter, when and to which number so that I can check into this.

Please accept my apologies for the late reply, unfortunately I don’t enjoy the luxury of postal delivery, so I received your letter last week just before my hard drive crashed and I’ve been very busy.

However, on 12/14/04 I had sent e-mail to your client Keith Hyatt, and when I received no response, I had faxed my request for review of my publications relating to your client on 12/23/04 to Larry Cerutti, partner at Rutan & Tucker.

Did they not get my email and fax and that’s why they didn’t they respond?

While the Dana Capital press release contained only a few paragraphs about Mr. Hyatt’s activities and your firm, I am now getting ready to dedicate an entire release to Mr. Hyatt, Laura Archer, Prime One Financial, Leads To Results, etc. and the people in charge.  As always, I strive for accuracy in my publications.

The issues:

1) I am suing Mr. Hyatt not as officer or owner of Infasource and Leads To Results, but as an individual involved with the illegal faxing.  Therefore, Infasource, Leads to Results and Mr. Hyatt are liable under the TCPA.

2) You stated that Mr. Hyatt does not own Leads To Results, Inc.  I apologize for my apparently erroneous conclusion that he owns Leads to Results, Inc. because he is still listed as its registered agent at 7700 Irvine Center Drive Ste 220 as of today.

a) You wrote that Mr. Hyatt was no longer employed since “at least September 7, 2004.” Please provide a description of you client’s duties at Leads To Results.

b) How do I serve Leads To Results? I don’t understand how your client can be the registered agent at their address when he hasn’t been an employee for over 4 months and presumably is no longer at that address.

3) Your client personally provided me with the 800-853-2393 and now you claim he does not own this number.  Did I misunderstand, does he own a similar number?

4) You claim that I registered for junk faxes.  Is this your idea of a joke? 

Nobody ever “registers” a number to receive mortgage junk faxes.  Your absurd claim may well be the reason for the FCC ruling requiring that junk faxers need to obtain written permission prior to faxing.

Please provide me with those records you claim to have so that I can sue the person who fraudulently “registered” me to receive junk faxes and I also need to file an ID Theft complaint with the police.  Please provide me with the exact process to register for your client’s junk faxes.  Should the Deputy contact Mr. Hyatt about this matter?

Last time I filed an ID Theft complaint, the Deputy wouldn’t investigate because I didn’t have the names and contact info for the people/companies involved and I’ll greatly appreciate your cooperation.

I was subjected to ID Theft last spring and I am extremely concerned.

5) You wrote that Hyatt has not engaged in the conduct asserted in my complaint and that he is prepared to execute a declaration stating so under penalty of perjury.

Mr. Hornak, I will dismiss your client from this action as soon as I have the original notarized declaration stating under penalty of perjury that he never had anything to do with the sending of unsolicited faxes, including during his employment with Leads to Results.

I don’t know how it can be that your client admitted to me on the phone that he has sent the faxes, maybe someone impersonated him too?

Isn’t it amazing how *somebody* pretended to be me and registered me to receive junk faxes and *somebody* pretended to be your client and gave me an incorrect phone number, admitted to the faxing and provided me with Larry Cerutti’s name and address as his attorney!!!!

If this is really true, would you please consider representing both me and Mr. Hyatt so that we can go after these unscrupulous imposters and share the associated legal fees?

With respect to your complaint about my publishing that Premserv Mortgage and others share the offices with Leads to Results, I obtained this information from public records and I see no reason to remove it. 

Apparently you don’t understand the purpose of my publications - to expose the scumbags AND the corporations and people who associate and do business with the scumbags.  If they don’t like being mentioned in the same sentence with the scumbags, they ought to move out - or kick out the scumbags - whatever works for them. 

I’m a big fan of personal responsibility and since the regulators and courts are really not doing their job and everything takes forever and scumbags merely start new corporations to continue with their illegal activities, this is a much more effective way to at least isolate the scumbags and help other litigants by sharing my research.

Mr. Hornak, I you feel the need to sue me for defamation or anything else, please don’t bother to pay to have me served.  I will certainly accept the waiver of service, you can just fax it to me.

I’m looking forward to take this matter wherever you like to take it - dismissal of your client or your choice of court and location - it’s your and your client’s call.  I hope to hear from you soon.

Very truly yours,

Christine Baker

c: posted at [this URL]

Wednesday, December 29, 2004

12/29/04 Press Release: Mortgage Banker Dana Capital Group Named in Junk Fax Lawsuit

I may end up with the record for the longest press release.  I tried to shorten it, but there was just so much I needed to get in for proper search results:

NAMES - lots of names, of the people and companies involved.

PHONE NUMBERS - the numbers on the faxes.

I almost limited the release to Dana Capital, but I think it’s important to show how I’m dealing with numerous junk faxers and I had promised Keith Hyatt a press release.

In the future, I’ll try to limit myself to just one scam and I’ll send out releases a lot more often. 

PRweb is God’s gift to consumers.

I didn’t have any attachments this time, so I went with the $30 distribution. 

Below is the entire release as well as at
http://prweb.com/releases/2004/12/prweb192051.htm

MORE...