Proof of Tom Heysek’s liability for sending junk faxes - should I try to serve Heysek?
Heysek already lost numerous small claims suits for over $42K, here are the scanned judgments
He lost some by default, but showed up for some and still lost. Will he appeal? Probably not, since he failed to comply with the subpoena.
Proof of Tom Heysek’s liability for sending junk faxes
There’s a tremendous amount of documentation, subpoenaed phone records, affidavits ....
I named Heysek in my amended complaint, but I see two problems:
1) serving him
2) collecting the judgment
Heysek apparently closed his office and got a PO box in San Francisco. That would work for serving, IF he accepts the mailing.
Regarding collecting, after reading Steve Kirsch’s research, it looks like a total waste of time to even go after him.
Comments:
*** Absolutely NO SPAM! A $50 handling and removal fee applies to each advertisement and occasionally I feature an advertised site as the scam it is.
Due to abuse, comments are moderated and are usually posted within a day. Registration is NOT required to post.
Only constructive comments are approved. I DELETE comments containing only dribble and a link to some commercial site.
This is NOT a graffiti wall and you may exercise your FREE SPEECH at YOUR site.
Contact info - credit reporting & scoring - legislative efforts